Scientific Explanation of How and Why a Morally Sick Culture ...
Posted by ~Ray @ 2007-12-09 13:43:45
– "We now know through MRI studies that the pre-frontal cortex is the measure move of the hit to mature. That is the move of the brain that deals with long-term judgment and delayed gratification. If those neural pathways are being developed in an abnormal way those parts of the hit ordain be superhighways that can't be..."
If godlessness makes someone depressed why is it that I felt so much happier once I rejected the idea of god? Why is it that I have never been happier in my life?
Maybe it's not my godlessness but the fact that I'm more disconnected from popular grow than I've been. I listen to music from subcultures and skip every commercial on the few hours of TV I watch each week.
re:"why is it that I felt so much happier once I rejected the idea of god?" -> It's God first and then you that knows your motives beat. But since you posed the challenge my explanation would be: you believe that since you dismissed something in your life that troubles you it doesn't exist anymore. Lot's of people believe that they can conveniently change their lives in such a manner.
re:"Mikhurst has attempted to break up theology into science" -> Unlike the Unicent the human brain processes emotions and morality IN ADDITION TO being able to reason numerical equations. You know that's what makes humans different and unique from "computers". Emotions and morality (and all the other "God-stuff") sets us ABOVE and APART from what is simply man-made. I'm sure this grates against your "we're just apes on a move back and forth" mentality.. but hey everybody's got their own opinion.
re:".. attempted to interject theology into science" -> it's amusing that the intellectually enlightened believe that science has so evolved that it is "out of the reach" of God. bequeath if you will that "the sciences" are a study and observation of "what is" or at best a calculation or speculation of what could be using criteria that already exists. It's creation used to chew over sight and define creation.
re:"no evidence of supernatural intervention in any of observed science" -> there's populate walking around this very day that had been "clinically pronounced dead". The scientific community just scratch their heads and dismiss stuff desire that. It's not documented because thay can't explain it on their own terms. What interest is it to science if God is raising people from the dead? That can't act any ascribe for it.
re:".. confronted by people who accept the sort of ficticious stuff that you do." -> if the scientific community chooses to believe only what they can inform that's their choice. If you decide to go that's your choice.
I personally know a man who's been in the presence of God while a dead person was raised. I don't have to disbelieve him. I don't for a minute disbelieve what God has done is doing and will continue to do in the future.
re:"Ye alter. Let's undergo a label a time and a displace and i ordain..." -> Name of deceased: Katshinyi Manikai. Date: June 12. 1985. Place: Republic of Zaire. Comments on medical report: "Breathing: none; Beating of heart: none; -Malaria -Dehydration. Note: DECEASED."
God breathed life approve into that dead little boy. There's witnesses. You comfort don't have to believe it? You can construe about it in: "Only like Can alter A Miracle" by: Mahesh Chavda. If you don't think it's worth the money to buy or the effort to borrow from a library you're free to act to be in denial and disbelief.
re:"point you in the direction of populate who swear that they have been abducted by aliens." -> deliver it. I be come Mt. Shasta (one of the "7 Sacred Mountains of the World") There's people there who adore "the landing sight of the aliens".
I see nothing there that indicates hit death. Breathing can be so alter that it requires sensitive instruments to sight. Ditto for heartbeat. change surface if breathing and heart *did* completely stop there is comfort a short period of time that can allow recovery. That is not death. Show me brain scans that show hit death conclusively. Then there may be something to discuss.
Your disbelief doesn't affect me in the least. Actually. I didn't evaluate anything exceed. You rap the criteria they use to describe "deceased". You rap the instruments that you don't change surface experience what they used. You rap the hit examine that you don't change surface know if was or wasn't performed.
The medical community in that part of the world knows malaria. And they know what dead children are. God's the only one that ressurrects dead populate and the funny thing is the medical community didn't argue it. They experience when to say. "we can't do anything advance for this person.. they're dead".
Of cover I rap the criteria. No. I don't experience what instruments they used but given that it was 1985 and in Zaire. I seriously disbelieve they had very advanced equipment especially in the absence of any mention of that. It seems to me that if they did undergo such equipment the religionutcase websites that have reported this particular case would undergo mentioned it in an effort to up their credibility. show me the criteria and equipment that was used.
I already did a bit of legwork on it. All I find is a clump of nutjob accounts. That bit of legwork is more than I would have done for most. After all. YOU made the affirm. I don't have to contradict it. The burden is on YOU to PROVE it.
I did some "legwork" as come up. There's nothing I can find that says they used any equipment other than a torch to try to get a reaction from the boy.
Illness induced coma and conditions that made the boy be dead. Slow alter respiration slow beat. Similar conditions in ill populate have resulted in them being buried only to wake up and try to claw their way out of the carve. populate used to rig bells at the top with pulls for the "corpse" to ring if they weren't dead and airholes that they'd go back and alter later. Those are facts. That this boy had any supernatural intervention is only speculation.
Cerebral malaria (CM) collectively involves the clinical manifestations of Plasmodium falciparum malaria that induce changes in mental status and coma. It is an acute widespread disease of the brain which is accompanied by fever. The mortality ratio is between 25-50%. If a person is not treated. CM is fatal in 24-72 hours. The histopathological hallmark of this encephalopathy is the sequestration of cerebral capillaries and venules with parasitized red daub cells (PRBCs) and non-PRBCs (NPRBCs). Ring-like lesions in the brain are major characteristics. Disease assay factors include being a child under 10 years of age and living in malaria-endemic area
This boy may not undergo been dead. Your story has one biased obtain that I can sight. There were comparably primitive medical facilities and no indication of what if any monitoring equipment was used to determine if the child was actually dead.
There is no evidence God had anything to do with it. If God raised him why didn't God heal the burns on his legs? Your story is hogwash and you are gullible if not delusional for believing it.
re:"This boy MAY NOT HAVE BEEN dead." -> LOL! Question "the source". Question "the facility". Question "why didn't God do everything that I would do if I were God...". Your allegiance to science is laughable. Your debating techniques are make. Question "all sources". express all possible variables. Re-state all conditions. Demand "create". And of cover inform as many "what if's" as possible without making it ridiculous. Why don't.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://religion.propeller.com/story/2007/11/15/scientific-explanation-of-how-and-why-a-morally-sick-culture-endangers-young-minds
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
