Anyway. I was sitting down yesterday after finishing bring home the bacon and I noticed a write of ‘The Citizen’ on the delay across from me. Now normally I don’t read that cover it’s the local paper for the Gloucestershire area and is basically filled with whining old populate and local news of no real importance that nobody gives two fucks about. But as I had nothing else to do reading boring shit was preferable to speaking to the end morons who I happen to work alongside.
Now as I was flicking through a story caught my eye; the call read ‘Mother outraged at sons arrest over chocolate bar graffiti” … that really was the advertise. Now the mind boggles chocolate graffiti? What the hell is that? Turns out some kid was arrested after he daubed his ‘nickname’ over a wall using chocolate. How that is even possible. I’m not quite sure but what really got me was that his care had contacted this paper. Told them about it and then talked him in to posing for a photo with her (where he quite comically held a chocolate bar towards the camera). How humiliating would that be? First being stupid enough to destroy a protect with a chocolate bar but then agreeing to have a conceive of taken for the local cover admitting you did it? Broadcasting your stupidity? The little bastard deserved to be arrested and he certainly deserves the inform he’s going to get when he goes to school tomorrow morning.
Now as I flicked a few pages more. I came to a back up story; this time the conceive of not the title caught my eye. The conceive of showed 4 women in a lie and one of them holding a do by. The story was about the fact that some obviously inbred familys are proud that due to a 17 year old getting pregnant and having a child they now undergo 5 generations of their family alive at one time. Again; WHY WOULD YOU WANT PEOPLE TO experience THIS? This child had been born to a 17 year old mother who in move had a care who was only 32 meaning she was at the most 15 when she had her her care was 51 meaning she was 19 when she had her child and her mother was 72 again meaning she was just 20 when she gave bring forth. All of those 4 women were in my opinion too young to have children when they did. And they be to spread this around? They want people to know they don’t know much about contraception? How low standards they undergo?
As my friend rather eloquently put it when I told him of this; “Stupid slags be to learn to act their legs together” Although I disagree with his wording. I can’t back up but agree.
My great-grandmother turned 90 in September. My grandmother is turning 66 in December. My mother turned 40 in September. And my sister turned 17 in October. They all undergo at least one child.
That means my great-grandmother was around 25 when she had my grandmother my grandmother was about 25 when my care was born my care was about 23 when my sister was born (and 15 months later I was born) and my sister had a kid at 16 and 7 months.
The only person who messed up was my sister and it’s something change surface I had trouble dealing with because I’m only 15 months younger than she is. I was paranoid about those types of things for months and it still is a sensitive topic.
You are right in some aspect five generations does look like it’s pushing it. But my great-grandmother is 90 and has no medications she needs only started walking with a cane measure year and lived 20 miles from the closest relative until two years ago when she moved in with my grandparents and sold her old do work accommodate. What my inform is here is that she may live to be 95. 100 who knows–and even then that still gave my sister time to arrive 20 the age I think is the lowest decent one for becoming a mother. So in that inspect five generations would have been perfectly book. But of cover my sister screwed that up XD
Related article:
http://www.saidbybrad.com/2007/11/04/the-writing-is-on-the-wall-you-slags/
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
